|
|
|
July and August 2003 NOTE: This issue is no longer available for purchase. The second and third reports in our thought provoking forest
health series are h No. 2 is “Will
This Environmental Disaster In Montana’s Bitterroot National Forest Be
The U.S. Senate’s Forest Legacy: Or Will This Recent Thinning In South
Dakota’s Black Hills National Forest Be The Senate’s Legacy?" No. 2 focuses on the forest health crisis in Montana and
South Dakota, pivotal states in the looming Senate battle. Were Democrats
Max Baucus, Montana, and Tom Daschle, South Dakota, to vote for a measure
that mirrors the legislation House members approved in May, many as yet
undecided Democrats would probably follow suit. Can you image a future in
which the West’s forests are cared for by garbage collectors and
surgeons? We can, and we tell you about it in this special report. Click here to view a pdf of "Will This Environmental Disaster In Montana's Bitterroot National Forest Be the U.S. Senate's Forest Legacy?" Adobe Acrobat Reader is required.
No. 3, the companion to No. 2 is, “What The Devil Is Our
Government’s Forest Management Objective.” No. 3 is a photo essay accompanied by a hard-hitting
perspective in which Evergreen publisher Jim Petersen suggests that the
only thing being protected in the public’s forests today is the
political influence of environmental groups whose decade-old objective has
been to retain power for themselves while disenfranchising other
stakeholders. These reports follow on the heels of last month’s report, “Time Is Running Out For Southwest Forests: Will Congress Act Before It’s Too Late?” There is a limited supply of this issue left for purchase. If you wish to order, click on "On Line Store" on the main menu to purchase any one or all three issues with your credit card. Note: This issue is no longer available for purchase. Click here to view a PDF of "What The Devil Is Our Government's Forest Management Objective?" . Adobe Acrobat Reader is required.
Evergreen
Magazine |
